The most common argument against the GST is that it is a regressive tax and so, will harm the low-income more than the middle-income more than the high-income. I think this argument is incredibly naïve.
All in Malaysia
The most common argument against the GST is that it is a regressive tax and so, will harm the low-income more than the middle-income more than the high-income. I think this argument is incredibly naïve.
I sincerely believe that a sound mathematical education is one of the keys to a mature (Malaysian or anywhere really) civil society.
What if, regardless of whatever a given country, call it country M, is doing right now, country M cannot escape the middle income trap because it is at its middle-income equilibrium?
I am somewhat puzzled and concerned over the absence of any mention of improving economic realities in the fight against crime.
The 13th General Elections is a wathershed of sorts as elections tend to be, and we would like to share some common views of how we move forward from here.
there is a lack of faith in official statistics. A question to ask is therefore what is really at stake from society's perspective when official statistics are believed to be fallacious?
Malaysia’s transformation must go beyond projects and policies – it must embrace the technological super-cycles that shape global economic history.